Website "No to Atheism". Apology of Christianity, criticism of atheism

Dear visitors, you are on the “Atheism-No” website, which is the result of 15 years of communication between the author and devoutly unbelieving people. The author does not intend to humiliate or offend atheistic feelings. Faith or Atheism is a personal matter for everyone. But, unfortunately, militant atheists “jump in” and try to justify their position to Orthodox believers in an overly militant way, not shying away from the dirtiest methods in criticizing the Russian Orthodox Church, Nevzorov’s outright lies and calls for violating the constitutional rights of believers, while also pretending to be sacred victims. We will teach you “How to Argue with Atheists.”

Atheism

his adherents "

“because there is no need to prove it. In fact, the “default worldview” is possessed by a deaf-mute autistic person in a punishment cell. He no longer needs to prove anything to anyone. However, science, which is so extolled by atheists, is also based on proving hypotheses and theorems. The ancient Greeks, who considered man to be a plant, and

Unlike Christians, who believed in a spherical Earth, they also acted “by default” - without multiplying entities, as the great monk Ockham bequeathed. And only Christian scientists, having invented experiments and built medieval universities, launched believing astronauts into space, after which it became finally clear that the Earth is a ball, and atheists are lying.

How has militant atheism recently achieved success in converting people to its faith and its secular rituals? Due to rabid propaganda based on the manipulation of consciousness. Schoolchildren and students are taught through all sorts of Credo.lies that they are bearers of “reason, logic and common sense” who protect science and secular life from oppression by religion and pedophile priests, of whom, according to Western media, there are much fewer than secular pedophiles. Schoolchildren feel pleased by such flattery from corrupt journalists, and with even greater zeal and malice they generate and spread anti-religious nonsense on VKontakte about the fact that the church allegedly sold cigarettes, wearing the mask of Anonymous as a sign of struggle, who (suddenly!) was actually a religious Catholic. Although quite learned secularists insistently explain to them that “Secularism is not atheism,” and secular ethics is contradictory and absurd. It is not surprising that atheists began to be suspected of inadequacy, while the root of this inadequacy may lie in psychopathological complexes and ignorance. Atheists don't read the Constitution or understand the Bible

The science

There is probably no sphere of human activity to which atheists would not cling as fiercely as science, which they consider almost their property. In fact, Christian Science arose long before atheists became prominent, and Christian Scientists relied on more than just “contradictions in the Bible.” Moreover, the atheists themselves killed scientists in such numbers that you can’t help but be amazed how they still have the conscience to trumpet at every corner about several martyrs of science who suffered not for science, but for the occult views that paganism gave rise to. Alas, atheistic scientists themselves called for repression, created weapons of mass destruction and conducted experiments on people.

Story

In terms of the amount of atheistic nonsense generated, “atheistic history” competes with “scientific atheism” almost on an equal footing. Atheistic propagandists need to prove that before (during the time of Christian civilization) everything was bad, hell, trash and the uselessness of religion. And as soon as the atheists came to power, everything suddenly became good, peace, friendship, chewing gum and an atheistic computer. But a harsh historical analysis shows that:

The Inquisition was just an innocent baby compared to the NKVD and the crimes of atheists.
Atheists are to blame for the “fierce 90s”
The Crusades were a response to the aggressive policies of the Muslims.
While condemning religious terrorism, we should not forget that terrorists can also be atheists.
Myths about 2/3 of the population destroyed during the Baptism of Rus' are neo-pagan nonsense, picked up by atheists.
The witch hunt is not a product of the “Dark Middle Ages”, but of the Age of Enlightenment. Moreover, it is also overgrown with myths.
In Medieval Europe there were baths and people washed themselves.
The genocide of the Indians is part of the Black Legend that defies common sense.
Medieval Christians loved medieval cats no less than modern bloggers.
Christians are not to blame for the decline of “Light Antiquity”. She herself broke down.

To appropriate all good people and push away the religions of all cannibals. maniacs and atheistic criminals, atheists are trying to present Hitler, Chikatilu, Stalin and the heap of communists as believers. And to show that only Christian religion is bad, they create a myth about the Good Religions of the East. And in order to show that the Russian Orthodox Church is bad, and other churches are good, they are forcing the ERL method. But the Church does a lot of good in the social sphere and in medicine, takes care of women and even pays taxes (although atheists are sure that it does not pay) - just as Patriarch Kirill says, who has a good watch, but does not pretend to be an Orthodox saint.

Atheist arguments

Among atheists, the belief in common sense and atheistic logic is firmly rooted, with which they supposedly easily beat the “priest’s fairy tales.” Schoolchildren from VKontakte are especially confident in this, confident that any topic can be easily explained with pictures. The most popular among pro-advanced people who claim to be the “intellectual elite of society” are caricatures of fat priests who allegedly do not even have the right to have their own church property and supposedly all ride around in jeeps and Mercedes, and meanwhile the people are starving. At the same time, the Bolsheviks, who actually drove Rolls-Royces and lived like bourgeois in front of the common people and destroyed cultural values, are hypocritically praised as the saviors of the people.

The appearance of priests is also ridiculed, although scientists wear beards and baggy clothes, and beautiful women wear Orthodox headscarves because of the dress code.

Atheists urge people to abandon religion because the Orthodox holy fathers, not such saints, are for some reason in no hurry to tear up their passports on the grounds that corrupt officials have entrenched themselves in power, and secular crime far exceeds the crimes of religious fanatics. It turns out that secular fanatics are much more dangerous than religious fanatics, Secular humanism is not entirely humane, and Liberalism is dangerous for humans, including its gay propaganda among children. And this is not to mention the fact that atheists are more prone to drugs

On the contrary, religion is useful for people and helps prevent suicide - stubborn statistics also show this.

————————

Since the Teacher of Atheism A. Nevzorov has recently appeared on the Internet, we have prepared a series of articles “Lessons of Deatheism”, in which we explain in an easy and intelligible form how this professional liar fools people’s brains. Separately, I would like to point out the original Anti-absentis section (which deals with popular near-medieval nonsense)

{jcomments off}

I believe

The site is dedicated to the blessed memory of the brilliant Jean Effel and is illustrated with his works.

So that there is no doubt: you are now on an ATHEISTIC site, and if I called it “I believe...”, then you will find the reasons and explanations for this below and on the internal pages. In a nutshell, I believe in the non-existence of God .

However, I'll start off strange. Below there was a video clip—don’t be surprised—of a church service. I think it's in a Texas church. Then the user deleted it from YouTube, and it became unavailable here too. So I deleted it too. Regretfully.

I listened to beautiful music, bewitching voices, saw inspired faces - so different, and so identical in their humanity, openness, dignity and kindness. And he already loved them. And in the end, it didn’t really matter to me whether they were believers ( of course, they are believers! ) or atheists...

This post is not very atheistic - I understand. But I hope that it is at least sufficiently humanistic. I think it's not so much about faith and religion, but about me and my atheism. Well, my guests also need to take this feature of the site into account... further on, a lot of things here will be harsh, but when you want to be indignant, please remember this preface. Just remember.

Are you an atheist? Welcome, perhaps we are allies. Your comments and criticism may be useful.
Are you a militant atheist? Well, come in, but perhaps we are opponents. Although I will be happy to listen to your comments and criticism. If she turns out to be smart and (or) talented, I will enjoy the communication. If she turns out to be mediocre and (or) stupid, I will experience a feeling of superiority, from which I will enjoy
Are you a person who believes in God? Most likely, we are ideological opponents, but anyway, come in. But I must warn you: your feelings may be hurt here. So if you are such a timid doe, leave the site now so as not to be offended later. Although no one here intends to humiliate your sense of human dignity in any case, just try to be adequate yourself.
Are you a smart but weak person, and without God would you feel uncomfortable and afraid to live? You better leave right away - there is a risk that there will be no stone left of your faith here.
Are you a stupid person and you feel this because you are always offended and deceived? Let's say goodbye now - I'm sorry, but you still won't understand anything here, and I won't be able to help you. But if you stay, I will answer your questions honestly, conscientiously and patiently.
Are you a strong, intelligent, believing person, and your faith is also strong, and are you ready to test the strength of your faith - to openly oppose atheism and atheists? Welcome, you are the most welcome guest! You can say that I’m just waiting for you! I hope for a fruitful discussion - on any issue.
Finally, are you a church minister? And are you ready to get acquainted with the materials of this site and, perhaps, participate in their discussions? Welcome! I admit that among the clergy there are sometimes decent and intelligent people, sincere and honest, who simply, due to circumstances, find themselves in the bosom of the church. Their human dignity will not be humiliated here either. (Amendment. Change in site policy. Check on the “No Soap...” page)

Now let's get down to basics. These are the principles of my relationship with God, faith, religion, church, temples .

god . This is unprovable (see page Prove why), but for me it is an axiom.

faith in God. Some people believe in it simply because they were given no choice (for details, see the “Faith and Mind” page), others because they are afraid to live (for details, see “Is Faith necessary?”). But in any case, one should not condemn a sincere believer. It may be a mistake and a delusion, but ANYONE has the right to both a mistake and a delusion, right? And one more thing: an adult has the right to CHOICE, and he also has the right to review this choice. Even if faith was initially imposed on him - “Faith and Mind.”

Religion is not at all the same as faith . Religion is a set of certain rules by which a believer’s relationship with HIS god is built. Or rather, with intermediaries between him and this very imaginary god. Religions, many religions, exist to DIVIDE people, to sow ALIENATION between people, to pit one against another. And that is ALWAYS how they were used. Still in use today. But a truly religious person does not need religion at all - he can communicate with the God in whom he believes, without any rules, and without intermediaries.

Show a passing comment or just read on...

If there was a God, he would not tolerate competitors in the form of other gods different religions in connection with this , nor repeated rewriting and editing of his WORD , whatever it was called, the Pali Canon, the Bible, the Koran, or whatever - then again, no intermediaries between themselves and the believer. His only temple would be the human soul, and he would communicate with everyone directly, and only in this temple. And everyone in this temple would be shown his path - precisely, unambiguously, unmistakably, so that a person would not need any more rules.

If there was a God, he would to everyone in their language. Or with everyone on the same page, but understandable to everyone. He's a god, right? And is this logical?

And his WORD would not need ANY or ANYONE's interpretation, it would be CLEAR and unambiguous - why communicate otherwise if you don't want to be UNDERSTANDED? And if you want it, then you try to ensure it! And how much work a PERSON sometimes has to put in for this! But HE is GOD, right? It’s easy for him. Or does he not need it? Or does he not care about his own word , if for centuries he has endured its countless and contradictory interpretations, and about the person to whom this word is addressed? Then - why EVERYTHING? Or, finally, IT simply DOESN'T exist? In the latter case, everything develops very logically!..

The Church is a special public organization, a STRUCTURE, created by interested parties for the mass duping and wholesale fleecing of believers. Previously, there was another purpose: to gather believers into ranks, so that you have no doubt - into armed ranks , - for the destruction of dissidents (or those of different faiths), which was carried out brilliantly. Now this function, fortunately, is gradually fading away (just don’t think that it has ALREADY disappeared - at least in the Russian Federation it is now being revived through the efforts of security officers in robes).

Show a passing comment or just read on...

Occasionally, decent people, priests, sincere believers themselves, who are found in the ranks of the church, helping weak people find spiritual peace and tranquility (even at the cost of delusions), do not change ANYTHING here. These are only exceptions that prove the RULE. And they, these priests, may well do (and sometimes do!) their USEFUL work as psychotherapists OUTSIDE the official church.

Temples as monuments of architecture and culture of the people, as the cultural heritage of ALL humanity, regardless of religions and confessions, must be protected and carefully preserved by states . But state support for religions is an ABUSE of the ideals of some citizens and outright THEFT.

Show a passing comment or just read on...

If only for the reason that state machines - all, without exception - exist at the expense of taxpayers, among whom there are atheists in ANY country. To support religious obscurantism with THEIR MONEY is theft, and also an outrage against THEIR feelings of BELIEVERS IN THE INSEXISTENCE OF GOD. In addition, supporting ONE religion to the detriment of the REST is the same theft and abuse of representatives of other religions and denominations - for the same reason. And teaching religion in schools is also a crime against the personality of a small defenseless man. I explained this thought here: “Faith and Mind.”

Here it is, in a nutshell. You can leave a comment on this page right here; registration on the site is not required. But I will check it before publishing - thanks for your understanding.

Show a passing comment or just read on...

In my search for a good domain name for an atheist site, I looked through the busy names. And all the “tasty” names were taken: ateist, atheist (a site with a bad reputation, don’t go), boganet (some kind of murky network, with the declaration “atheistic”, in which... however, if you want, look for yourself), ateism , ateizm, atheism, - then again themselves. And this is only in the ru zone! I had to settle for what was left. And here you are. And this is what I discovered with amazement. There are not many atheist sites on the Internet. Anti-clerical, anti-church - as many as you like. Do you understand the difference? And the atheists...

So, THIS site will be ATHEISTIC, based on both meanings of the word “theism”, namely: “in a broad sense - belief in God or gods; in a narrow sense, a religious and philosophical worldview that asserts that the world was created by God and that the creator continues his activity in the world he created” (Wikipedia).

Perhaps anti-clerical notes will appear on the site... well, they will inevitably appear. But - notes, and nothing more. (Edit. Clarification on the page “No Soap...”) Because the CHURCH, by and large, does not interest me. In some ways, perhaps, with all my atheism, I even recognize its usefulness. But this is further, on the inner pages. But I am interested in GOD and FAITH. I am ANTI to them. And the church to me is so... well, not at all in general.

I also hope that my critique of theism will turn out to be unconventional. It will most often proceed from the assumption of the existence of God. And - you will see - in some sense it turns out that the true believers on Earth are precisely the atheists. Believers in the NON-EXISTENCE of God.

By the way, this is also very convenient from a practical point of view. While you and I here are all such godless atheists, the current Russian law almost doesn’t consider us as people. Well, it gives us the right to remain atheists, and that's all. But as soon as we become believers in the non-existence of God (and where is it written what a believer can believe in and what not?), we will immediately be able to file lawsuits in court for insulting the feelings of believers, if anything happens. And let them try not to accept it! So, atheists, go to my sandbox!

Remark: you will find a lot of expressions on the pages of the site such as “thank God”, “forgive me, Lord”, “God forbid” and the like.
So this is just a figure of speech. I use these expressions quite deliberately, simply because that’s what I usually say. And I think the language of the site should not differ from my living language. I'll also try to make sure it doesn't get boring here. On the sites I visited, you can hang yourself from boredom. And - from the terrible number of “letters” and “words”. It's terrible how pissy they all are! I’ll try to keep it short and funny, in the spirit of Jean Effel... Well, let’s see how it turns out...